The Chicago Bears have officially declared their plans to build a new $5 billion domed stadium and mixed-use development in Hammond, Indiana, as their exclusive focus, effectively ending efforts to revive a stadium proposal in Illinois. This move follows the Bears’ board voting in June to advance the Indiana project and Indiana Governor Mike Braun expressing optimism about the progress, calling the deal “in the red zone.” Since Illinois failed to pass relevant stadium legislation over two months ago, the Bears have had only minimal engagement with Illinois officials, citing unresolved issues like property tax and infrastructure certainty as key obstacles.

Bears president and CEO Kevin Warren emphasized that the franchise requires clear tax and infrastructure assurances and described the team’s current stance as wholly centered on the development in Hammond. Two potential site locations in Hammond are under review, with the possibility that both might be incorporated into the stadium plans. Despite this, Illinois political leaders, including Governor JB Pritzker, maintain some hope that the Bears might remain in the state and point to state lawmakers’ efforts to pass separate stadium bills in the House and Senate. However, Pritzker argues that it is ultimately up to the Bears to consolidate these legislative efforts and rally support.

Bears chairman George McCaskey bluntly dismissed the notion of Illinois as a fallback option, stating, “Hope is not a strategy.” He also confirmed that the team will continue to brand itself as the Chicago Bears regardless of the final stadium location. Hammond, though across the state border from Chicago by roughly 20 miles, is still situated closer to downtown Chicago than previous Illinois site proposals. McCaskey believes fans will adapt once they experience the new stadium and associated developments, highlighting the Bears’ priority on delivering a world-class venue and fan experience.

The state of Indiana has demonstrated significant commitment to the project, passing legislation in February to cover approximately 60% of the stadium’s development costs. This financial backing contrasts with Illinois’ stalled legislative process and underscores Indiana’s advantage in securing the Bears’ future home. With no fully executed deal yet in place for the Indiana stadium, Illinois remains hopeful but the Bears’ leadership has made it clear that Hammond is their primary and most advanced option moving forward.