USA Today faced significant backlash following a column by sports columnist Nancy Armour regarding WNBA star Caitlin Clark. In the piece, Armour controversially invoked the 1955 murder of Emmett Till and linked some of Clark’s fan base to white nationalism while discussing accusations of “flopping” in the WNBA. The comparison and framing sparked widespread criticism, with many deeming the article inflammatory and inappropriate. Among the critics was The Athletic’s Sam Vecenie, who expressed disbelief that such content was published by a reputable outlet.
In response to the outcry, USA Today updated Armour’s article with an editor’s note to provide additional context and clarity. Armour herself issued a statement on Threads apologizing for her “inartful comparison” with Emmett Till and acknowledged she had failed to provide sufficient background for the analogy. She explained her intention was to highlight the racial history connected to the WNBA’s All-Star Game being held in Chicago, Till’s hometown, and to underscore the threats faced by Black players in the league, including online abuse and death threats.
USA Today’s chief communications officer, Lark-Marie Anton, defended the publication by noting Armour’s column was labeled as opinion journalism. However, the outlet confirmed no further comments would be made beyond the clarification and Armour’s own public remarks. The controversy also spotlighted ongoing challenges in the WNBA amid heightened tensions and safety concerns, as exemplified by the recent incident involving Alyssa Thomas and Caitlin Clark, which drew league disciplinary action and subsequent threats against Thomas.
Critics across social media and sports journalism platforms debated the appropriateness of Armour’s arguments, with some dismissing the column as “ragebait” and others condemning the conflation of on-court behavior with physical danger to Black and queer players. Despite the backlash, USA Today stands by the editorial framing as an opinion piece while committing to clearer contextualization of sensitive historical references going forward.
Start the discussion with a take, question, or market read.